Country risk profile
Palestine
- ISO
- PSE
- Region
- Asia
- Population
- 5.5M
- Profile
- updated 9 Oct 2026, 06:02 UTC
Composite risk
85/100
SevereAssessment summary
The published severe-risk rating is led by Conflict and Governance, based on 3 of 7 risk groups.
At-a-glance evidence
Risk ratings and primary indicators
Ratings apply published thresholds to each source value. Low means the observed value is below elevated-risk thresholds; no data means no verified observation.
Primary source indicators
Full evidence and limitations ↓Governance
High28.8 / 100
Higher means stronger governance
Corruption perception
No dataUnavailable
Higher means cleaner public sector
Humanitarian risk
High6.5 / 10
Higher means greater crisis risk
Listed labour-risk goods
Low0 goods
Count of listed country-good observations
Sanctions designations
Low80 recorded
Recorded designations, not unique subjects
Violent-event intensity
Severe100 / 100
Higher means greater reported intensity
FATF status
LowNot listed
Published jurisdiction list status
State fragility
High87.9 / 120
Higher means greater fragility
Press freedom
High32.1 / 100
Higher means greater press freedom
Environmental performance
No dataUnavailable
Higher means better performance
Published score inputs
What drives the score
01Conflictsevere 3 / 3
- very high violent event intensity (100/100, 180-day GDELT CAMEO)
- high war event intensity (24% armed clashes/terrorism, 180-day GDELT CAMEO)
02Governancehigh 2 / 3
- low governance score (28.8/100, WB WGI 2025)
- high INFORM risk (6.5/10, INFORM 2026)
03SanctionsUnclassified 0 / 3
- Available inputs are below the published risk thresholds.
Calculation and all contributing groups
Group total 5 ÷ 3 available groups. Base 55.6 → published 85/100.
- Governance
- high · 2/3
- Conflict
- severe · 3/3
- Sanctions
- unclassified · 0/3
Published assessment rationale
Severe risk driven by Conflict (severe — very high violent event intensity (100/100, 180-day GDELT CAMEO)) and Governance (high — low governance score (28.8/100, WB WGI 2025)).
Coverage measures available evidence, not certainty. See the exact formula and thresholds.
Palestine narrative assessment
Palestine carries a composite risk score of 85 out of 100 on the [S/1] scorecard, placing it in the severe risk band as of 9 October 2026. The result is based on 3 of 7 indicator groups (limited evidence coverage); unavailable groups are excluded rather than treated as low risk. It records a World Bank governance score of 28.8 out of 100 (2025, higher is better) and an INFORM crisis-risk index of 6.5 out of 10 (2026, higher is worse). Exposure includes 80 sanctions or debarment designations linked to Palestine within [S/1]'s 18-source configured coverage model, using the source data currently available. The groups driving the assessment are governance and conflict. All figures are drawn from official open-data sources and carry their own publication year. This is a country-level screening input, not an entity-level determination.
Continue the assessment
Apply the country context.
Project assessment uses this profile as regional context. Establish site-specific impacts through project and stakeholder evidence.
Country annex: €29 once · included in Pro.
Indicator evidenceSource values, publication years and links
Published values retain their original units and scale directions. Open each source before using an indicator in a decision.
CORRUPTION · TI CPI
Data not available
Source last ingested: Oct 2026
CHILD / FORCED LABOUR · US DOL
0 GOODS Low
No country-good observation in the current source release. This is not evidence of low supplier risk.
SOURCE: US DOL TVPRA · link ↗
SANCTIONS · 18 CONFIGURED SOURCES
80 DESIGNATIONSLow
Selected lists: EU 7 · OFAC 62 · UN 0 · UK 11 · SECO 0
A country-level count is a screening signal, not a finding about any specific entity or evidence of national culpability.
VIOLENT EVENTS · GDELT
100/100 INTENSITYSevere
180-day CAMEO violent event intensity (normalized 0-100)
SOURCE: GDELT · queried 09/10/2026 · link ↗
FATF STATUS
NOT LISTED Low
Not in the FATF list — not subject to FATF monitoring or call for action
SOURCE: FATF · link ↗
FRAGILE STATES INDEX
87.9/120High
Fund for Peace — higher = more fragile
SOURCE: Fragile States Index · 2023 · link ↗
PRESS FREEDOM · RSF
32.1/100High
Reporters Without Borders — higher = more free
SOURCE: RSF Press Freedom · 2026 · link ↗
ENV. PERFORMANCE · YALE EPI
Data not available
Source last ingested: Sept 2026
CLIMATE RISK · ND-GAIN
Data not available
Source last ingested: Oct 2026
LABOUR RIGHTS · ILO
Data not available
Source last ingested: Oct 2026
CHILD LABOUR · ILO ILOSTAT
Data not available
Source last ingested: Oct 2026
POLITICAL FREEDOM · FREEDOM HOUSE
Data not available
Source last ingested: —
Additional inputs
- War events · 180-day GDELT
- 23.6/100 intensity2026-10-09 · Source ↗
- OECD country risk category
- No country observation
- IMF programme severity
- No country observation
- Trade circumvention signal
- No country observation
- EU forced-labour product groups
- No country observation
- PM2.5 annual mean
- No country observation
- Water stress
- No country observation
- Land degradation
- No country observation
- Human development · context only
- 73/1002023 · Source ↗
Source dates and coverageIngestion and publication context
Observation periods, recorded pipeline dates and fallback status are distinct. A recent pipeline date does not verify the observation or establish complete coverage.
Scorecard computed9 Oct 2026, 06:02 UTC
- Governance · WB WGI
- Observation period: 2025
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:02 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Corruption · TI CPI
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:00 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - INFORM Risk · JRC
- Observation period: 2026
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:05 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Child / forced labour · US DOL
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:05 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Sanctions · aggregate ingestion marker
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 9 Oct 2026, 03:01 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Violent events · GDELT
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 9 Oct 2026, 04:36 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - FATF
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:00 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Fragile States Index
- Observation period: 2023
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:06 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Press freedom · RSF
- Observation period: 2026
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:06 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Environmental performance · Yale
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 1 Sept 2026, 04:06 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Climate risk · ND-GAIN
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:05 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Labour rights · ILO NORMLEX
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:05 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Child labour · ILOSTAT
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:05 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Political freedom · Freedom House
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: Not recorded
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Country risk category · OECD
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:05 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Lending programmes · IMF
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:05 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Trade patterns · UN Comtrade
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 3 Oct 2026, 02:01 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Human development · UNDP
- Observation period: 2023
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 08:06 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Forced labour · EU
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: Not recorded
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Air quality
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:11 UTC
Fallback status not supplied by this source record. - Water and land · ingestion paused
- Observation period: Unknown or not supplied
Pipeline date: 1 Oct 2026, 04:12 UTC
Historical fallback observations are unverified. UN SDG ingestion is paused pending reuse-term verification.
Sector exposureCountry × sector and commodity signals
Sector Risk Intelligence
Child labour by sector · Conflict minerals · EUDR commodity risk · Forced labour detentions
Published model changes · 12 months
Recent score changes
Loading material changes…
These entries record changes in published model outputs. Review the source dates and evidence before relying on a change.
Research and reuseSources, methods and related evidence
Common questions about Palestine risk
What is the overall risk level of Palestine?
Palestine scores 85 out of 100 on the [S/1] composite risk scorecard, which places it in the severe risk band as of 9 October 2026. The result uses 3 of seven indicator groups and has limited evidence coverage; the unavailable groups are corruption & financial crime, labour & human rights, economic fragility and environmental. The composite uses the available scores across seven indicator groups: governance, corruption and financial crime, labour and human rights, conflict, sanctions, economic fragility, and environmental. Groups score 0–3; the available-group average is converted to a base percentage and calibrated using the formula published on the methodology page.
Is Palestine on the FATF grey list?
No. Palestine does not appear on the FATF grey list or black list in the current FATF data [S/1] holds as of 9 October 2026. FATF updates its lists three times per year, so check the current FATF statement before relying on this.
How many sanctions designations are linked to Palestine?
[S/1] records 80 sanctions or debarment designations linked to Palestine within its 18-source configured coverage model, using the source data currently available as of 9 October 2026. These include 62 on the US OFAC SDN list, 7 on the EU consolidated list and 11 on the UK FCDO list. Source availability varies and is published separately. A country-level count is a screening signal, not a finding about any specific entity.
How well governed is Palestine?
Palestine scores 28.8 out of 100 on the World Bank's Worldwide Governance Indicators for 2025, where a higher score is better. The WGI aggregate combines Voice and Accountability, Political Stability, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, and Control of Corruption.
Is there active conflict in Palestine?
[S/1] records a normalised conflict-event intensity of 100.0 out of 100 for Palestine, derived from CAMEO-coded violent event data in GDELT. This measures the volume and severity of reported events over a rolling window; it reflects what has been reported in media, not a verified operational assessment.
Where does the Palestine risk data come from?
The Palestine scorecard aggregates official open-data sources including the World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators, Transparency International CPI, the European Commission JRC INFORM index, US DOL TVPRA, FATF, the Fragile States Index, RSF, ILO NORMLEX and GDELT, together with an 18-source configured sanctions and debarment coverage model including OFAC, the EU consolidated list, UK FCDO and the UN Security Council. Each indicator carries its own publication year, shown on the page, and current pipeline health is published in the source directory. The scorecard was last generated on 9 October 2026.
From context to decision
What should happen after a country-risk signal?
Country indicators should route diligence, not decide whether a specific supplier is acceptable. Add sector exposure, resolve the legal entity, reconstruct ownership and control, screen connected parties, and verify the facts that matter to the transaction.
Use this evidence in your work
Cite this profile in a briefing or embed a live card in your research portal. Keep the source date and country-level limitations alongside the evidence.
Salient One (2026-10-09). Palestine Country Risk Profile. https://s1.salientone.eu/scorecard/palestine. Country-level context; not an entity determination.