LOADING SCORECARD…
COG · Africa · pop. 6.1M · generated 25 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC
COMPOSITE RISK
Severe risk driven by Labour & Human Rights (severe — very high child labour rate (20% of children aged 5-17, ILO ILOSTAT 2021)), Economic Fragility (severe — OECD country risk category 7/7 — highest risk (OECD CRC 2026)), Environmental (severe — extreme climate vulnerability and very low adaptive readiness (ND-GAIN 27/100 2023)), Governance (high — low governance score (28.5/100, WB WGI 2024)), Corruption & Financial Crime (high — high corruption perception (23/100, TI CPI 2025)), and Conflict (moderate — elevated violent event intensity (11/100, 180-day GDELT CAMEO)).
Evidence coverage · complete
The engine sums the available group scores (14), divides by 7, and calibrates the resulting 0–100 base score using the published method. Base 66.7 → published 100/100.
Coverage describes available country-level evidence, not confidence in any entity-level decision. See the exact formula and thresholds.
Republic of the Congo carries a composite risk score of 100 out of 100 on the [S/1] scorecard, placing it in the severe risk band as of 25 August 2026. The result is based on 7 of 7 indicator groups (complete evidence coverage); unavailable groups are excluded rather than treated as low risk. It records a World Bank governance score of 28.5 out of 100 (2024, higher is better), a Transparency International CPI score of 23 out of 100 (2025, higher is cleaner) and an INFORM crisis-risk index of 5.8 out of 10 (2026, higher is worse). Exposure includes 7 sanctions or debarment designations linked to Republic of the Congo within [S/1]'s 18-source configured coverage model, using the source data currently available. The groups driving the assessment are governance, corruption & financial crime, labour & human rights, economic fragility and environmental. All figures are drawn from official open-data sources and carry their own publication year. This is a country-level screening input, not an entity-level determination.
CHILD / FORCED LABOUR · US DOL
0 GOODS
No country-good observation in the current source release. This is not evidence of low supplier risk.
SOURCE: US DOL TVPRA · link ↗
SANCTIONS · EU/OFAC/UN/UK/SECO
7 DESIGNATIONS
EU 3 · OFAC 0 · UN 0 · UK 0 · SECO 0
VIOLENT EVENTS · GDELT
11/100 INTENSITYmoderate
90-day CAMEO violent event intensity (normalized 0-100)
SOURCE: GDELT · queried 25/08/2026 · link ↗
FATF STATUS
NOT LISTED
Not in the FATF list — not subject to FATF monitoring or call for action
SOURCE: FATF · link ↗
FRAGILE STATES INDEX
90.7/120high
Fund for Peace — higher = more fragile
SOURCE: Fragile States Index · 2023 · link ↗
PRESS FREEDOM · RSF
61.2/100
Reporters Without Borders — higher = more free
SOURCE: RSF Press Freedom · 2026 · link ↗
ENV. PERFORMANCE · YALE EPI
41.6/100high
Yale Environmental Performance Index — higher = better
SOURCE: Yale EPI · 2024 · link ↗
CLIMATE RISK · ND-GAIN
27/100severe
Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index — higher = better adapted (vuln. 65%, ready 22%)
SOURCE: ND-GAIN · 2023 · link ↗
LABOUR RIGHTS · ILO NORMLEX
8/8
ILO fundamental conventions ratified — higher = stronger labour protections
SOURCE: ILO NORMLEX · 2026 · link ↗
CHILD LABOUR · ILO ILOSTAT
20%severe
Children aged 5–17 in child labour — ILO survey estimate
SOURCE: ILO ILOSTAT · 2021 · link ↗
POLITICAL FREEDOM · FREEDOM HOUSE
Data not available
Last fetch attempt: —
Sector Risk Intelligence
Child labour by sector · Conflict minerals · EUDR commodity risk · Forced labour detentions
Republic of the Congo scores 100 out of 100 on the [S/1] composite risk scorecard, which places it in the severe risk band as of 25 August 2026. The result uses 7 of seven indicator groups and has complete evidence coverage; The composite uses the available scores across seven indicator groups: governance, corruption and financial crime, labour and human rights, conflict, sanctions, economic fragility, and environmental. Groups score 0–3; the available-group average is converted to a base percentage and calibrated using the formula published on the methodology page.
No. Republic of the Congo does not appear on the FATF grey list or black list in the current FATF data [S/1] holds as of 25 August 2026. FATF updates its lists three times per year, so check the current FATF statement before relying on this.
[S/1] records 7 sanctions or debarment designations linked to Republic of the Congo within its 18-source configured coverage model, using the source data currently available as of 25 August 2026. These include 3 on the EU consolidated list. Source availability varies and is published separately. A country-level count is a screening signal, not a finding about any specific entity.
Republic of the Congo scores 23 out of 100 on the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index for 2025. The CPI runs from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean) and measures perceived public-sector corruption based on expert assessments and business surveys.
Republic of the Congo scores 28.5 out of 100 on the World Bank's Worldwide Governance Indicators for 2024, where a higher score is better. The WGI aggregate combines Voice and Accountability, Political Stability, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, and Control of Corruption.
[S/1] records a normalised conflict-event intensity of 10.6 out of 100 for Republic of the Congo, derived from CAMEO-coded violent event data in GDELT. This measures the volume and severity of reported events over a rolling window; it reflects what has been reported in media, not a verified operational assessment.
The Republic of the Congo scorecard aggregates official open-data sources including the World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators, Transparency International CPI, the European Commission JRC INFORM index, US DOL TVPRA, FATF, the Fragile States Index, RSF, Freedom House, ILO NORMLEX and GDELT, together with an 18-source configured sanctions and debarment coverage model including OFAC, the EU consolidated list, UK FCDO and the UN Security Council. Each indicator carries its own publication year, shown on the page, and current pipeline health is published in the source directory. The scorecard was last generated on 25 August 2026.
From context to decision
Country indicators should route diligence, not decide whether a specific supplier is acceptable. Add sector exposure, resolve the legal entity, reconstruct ownership and control, screen connected parties, and verify the facts that matter to the transaction.
Compare nearby jurisdictions in the same regional evidence context.
[S/1] SCORECARD aggregates publicly available country risk indicators from official sources. It supports geopolitical risk scoring but does not constitute a final risk decision and is not a substitute for entity-level assessment. Verify outputs manually.
Methodology and data sources · Browse all country risk profiles
Need a deeper, human-verified investigation?
Salient One combines source-cited data, network analysis and human judgement. Its human-led investigation layer supports complex decisions in conflict-affected, fragile, and high-risk jurisdictions.
Commission an investigation ▸