Country × Sector Risk Matrix · [S/1] by Salient One

Compare sourcing origins

One product and sector. Up to four countries. Coverage gaps remain visible.

1–4 origins

SectorCommodity or productReview stage

Brazil

14 published product terms in the selected origins and sector. Other terms are checked for matching evidence; an empty result does not mean low risk.

Examples

Applied comparison · Onboarding

Coffee · Agriculture & Food

Swipe the table to compare all origins →

Assessment	BrazilBRA
Country contextPublished composite rating	High7/7 dimensions with data
Sector-adjusted contextModel inputs and coverage	Moderate6/6 inputs observed
Product evidenceObservations matching the requested product	High3 matching observations
Broader sector evidenceApplies to sector context, not the specific product	Moderate1 sector observations
Evidence coverageA coverage gap is not a low-risk finding	Product evidence3 subject-specific observations matched the requested commodity or product.
Review requirement	Enhanced evidence is indicated before supplier onboarding, award or renewal.3 sources · evidence version 9 Oct 2026
Inspect origin	Country profile ↗

Bands describe different evidence layers and are not added into a supplier score. Source editions differ; review the dated observations below.

Evidence & review

Brazil

Product evidence

3 subject-specific observations matched the requested commodity or product.

Forced LabourSevere

Sector intensified forced labour exposure (×2.0) — jurisdictional forced labour indices include: Bananas, Cashews, Cattle and 10 supplementary categories.

EnvironmentalSevere

Sector profile significantly intensified environmental harm risk (×2.5), elevating the effective risk rating from moderate to severe.

GovernanceModerate

Regulatory enforcement risk is intensified by sector-specific governance deficits (×1.2).

CorruptionModerate

Intensified corruption exposure driven by sector-specific opaque procurement (×1.3).

Source-linked evidence

4 of 4 observations · Effective and retrieval dates are shown separately.

ScopeRisk typeBandSource

Observation	Band & scope	Source & dates	Provenance
Child labourCoffee	HighProduct matchStatus: listed	US DOL TVPRA ↗Effective: 5 Sept 2024Retrieved: 1 Oct 2026	Derived by Salient OneMethod: tvpra-sector-map-1.0 Interpretation & limits US DOL-listed good mapped to the S1 Agriculture & Food sector. The high band routes enhanced verification and is not a finding about a specific supplier or shipment.
Forced labourCoffee	HighProduct matchStatus: listed	US DOL TVPRA ↗Effective: 5 Sept 2024Retrieved: 1 Oct 2026	Derived by Salient OneMethod: tvpra-sector-map-1.0 Interpretation & limits US DOL-listed good mapped to the S1 Agriculture & Food sector. The high band routes enhanced verification and is not a finding about a specific supplier or shipment.
DeforestationBroader sector contextValue: 0.24 %/yr	ModerateSector context	World Bank — Forest area indicator ↗Effective: 31 Dec 2023Retrieved: 1 Oct 2026	Derived by Salient OneMethod: forest-area-trend-1.0 Interpretation & limits S1 relative annual trend derived from World Bank AG.LND.FRST.ZS forest area as a percentage of land area; it is not a Global Forest Watch tree-cover-loss measure.
Eudr commoditycoffee	Not ratedProduct match	Salient One derived EUDR scope flag ↗Effective: 22 Aug 2026Retrieved: 1 Oct 2026	Derived by Salient OneMethod: eudr-scope-screen-1.0 Interpretation & limits S1 screening scope flag for coffee; the cited regulation defines the relevant commodity scope, while the country–commodity pairing is an internal evidence-review flag. It is not the EU country benchmark or an externally published severity rating.

Verification checklist

Onboarding · 0/6 done. Checklist status does not change the risk ratings.

Reconstruct ownership and actual control, including material historical changes and opaque jurisdictions.
Onboarding review
No note recorded.
Evidence note
Status for Reconstruct ownership and actual control, including material historical changes and opaque jurisdictions.
Verify licences, banking route, tax or distress signals and the operating facts material to the engagement.
Onboarding review
No note recorded.
Evidence note
Status for Verify licences, banking route, tax or distress signals and the operating facts material to the engagement.
Preserve the approval rationale, evidence dates, limitations, owner and next review trigger.
Onboarding review
No note recorded.
Evidence note
Status for Preserve the approval rationale, evidence dates, limitations, owner and next review trigger.
Trace the product to its production sites and verify labour conditions.
US DOL TVPRA · 2024
No note recorded.
Evidence note
Status for Trace the product to its production sites and verify labour conditions.
Obtain production-location and traceability records; verify applicable land-use requirements.
World Bank — Forest area indicator · 2023
No note recorded.
Evidence note
Status for Obtain production-location and traceability records; verify applicable land-use requirements.
Screen the supplier and relevant connected parties using verified identifiers.
Country and commodity evidence does not establish a supplier’s sanctions status.
No note recorded.
Evidence note
Status for Screen the supplier and relevant connected parties using verified identifiers.

Saved notes stay in this tab until the session ends. They are included in the Markdown export and excluded from share links. Use your organisation’s approved system for the final decision record.

Screen a counterparty →Full country profile

Explore source coverage by country

This map shows published observation counts. It does not measure risk or establish complete product coverage.

Current evidence coverage

Explore the matrix by country

Colour shows the number of published source-linked observations—not a country risk rating. Select a country to inspect its sectors, commodities and sources.

Open full matrix

1–4 observations5–14 observations15–39 observations40+ observationsNo current observation

Hover for coverage · Select a highlighted country to filter the canonical matrix · Empty coverage is not evidence of low risk

Method, source downloads and limits

How to read the comparison

Country bands are published composite ratings. Sector-adjusted bands use the existing sector model only when all required inputs are observed. Product and sector evidence bands show the most elevated matching source observation; they are not combined into a supplier score.

Missing, unsupported and temporarily unavailable evidence are separate states. No match is not evidence of low risk. Verify current primary records and record a supplier-level decision in your approved system.

Full scoring and evidence method →

Published source data

Source facts, S1 derivations, effective dates and retrieval dates remain visible in each evidence row.

Project assessment

Continue with project scoping, impacts on people, stakeholder engagement and mitigation. Sourcing observations inform supply-chain questions; project evidence is needed to establish site-specific impacts.

Original S1 prompts referencing the IFC Performance Standards (2012).

Assess a project →

What does the S1 Country × Sector Risk Matrix do?

It combines current country context, sector weighting and source-linked commodity or product observations into an evidence-routing brief for supplier due diligence.

Does a sourcing evidence brief approve a supplier?

No. It is a country-, sector- and commodity-level routing aid, not a finding about a supplier, shipment or transaction.